How to Be a Wildlife Photographer on a Budget

wildlife photography on a budget

If you were to ask me what question I hear most from the Nature TTL readers, it would definitely be along the lines of “how can I be a wildlife photographer with a limited budget?”. It’s a topic I’ve touched on before in some of our first articles, but I think it’s time to revisit the topic and answer some of your burning questions. In this article I’m going to look not only at the latest budget lenses on the market, but also what you can expect in terms of results when you don’t have the best professional grade gear.

cheap equipment for wildlife photos

What Budget is Too Little?

Chances are you’re looking to get yourself a camera body and telephoto lens to start you on the path to wildlife photography. Whilst ‘budget’ telephotos are on the market, they definitely aren’t available for just pocket change. It is no secret that these lenses leave a lot to be desired when you compare them to the high-end telephotos, but they still cost the manufacturers a fair amount to produce – there’s a lot of glass and parts to them.

So what’s a realistic minimum spend for wildlife photography equipment? Well, assuming you are starting with nothing and are in need of both a body and a telephoto, then a budget of around £1,000 ($1,400 USD) will give you a reasonable setup. If you can increase this further then it’s definitely worth doing.

What Results Can You Expect?

You’re now probably wondering what kind of results you can expect, photographically speaking, from this kind of equipment. I started my photography with very basic equipment, eventually upgrading to a budget telephoto lens when I could afford it. Even so, I had some great success with the lens. At the time (back in 2008) I was shooting with a Sigma 170-500mm f/5.0-6.3 lens – a model of the Sigma telephotos that has been discontinued and since improved upon.

In fact, I owe Sigma a lot of credit for this lens. A budget lens like this cost me around £600, and allowed me to delve into the field. I used it to take a photo of a red squirrel which won me the title of Young British Wildlife Photographer of the Year in 2009 from the British Wildlife Photography Awards. Even today shooting on professional lenses, I still sell copies of this photo regularly. I’m telling you this because it is most definitely possible to take great photos with low-end equipment.

wildlife photography on a budget

It’s really down to you as the photographer. I know that sounds cliché, but it’s true. The main downsides of budget telephotos are the decreased maximum aperture (less light is let into the camera) and decreased sharpness because of the glass quality. It’s up to you to get the most from the equipment, and that is done through practice and persistence – something you would need to apply to professional lenses too. Budget lenses provide you with limitations of course, but you can still take impacting portraits of wildlife and capture birds in flight with good technique. The beautiful, soft bokeh that is sought after to isolate the subject from the scene is still possible with budget telephotos too – there are many factors at play which create this effect.

Budget Camera Bodies

Let’s take a look at some of your options when it comes to buying a camera body on a budget.

Nikon

Nikon D3300 Wildlife PhotographyI took the red squirrel photo earlier in this article on a Nikon D80 – a very basic camera that has since been surpassed many times. For the same price (about £300) you can buy a camera that is much better than what I was shooting with.

Nowadays the entry-level cameras are the Nikon D3000 series. The latest in that series is the Nikon D3300, available for £325 (and that’s with a kit lens – great to get you started). This camera boasts 24.2 megapixels, full HD video recording, and ISO sensitivity up to 12,800. That’s much more than I could have hoped for when I first started out.

If you’ve got a little more to spend, then take a look at the D7000 series. The Nikon D7200 brings with it some attractive features like 6 frames per second shooting speed and better ISO capabilities. It is definitely pricier, costing £699 at the time of writing this article. The previous models in the series (the D7100 and D7000) are cheaper and still great cameras.

Another Nikon camera body worth considering is the Nikon D5500. It costs £720 and is definitely pushing the limit of a ‘budget’ camera, but you get what you pay for.

All of the cameras mentioned here have APS-C sensors (they are cropped sensors; not full frame). That’s definitely a bonus when you’re starting out as a wildlife photographer. Cropped sensors give you more reach with your lens – that is to say you’ll be able to ‘zoom in’ more than you could on a full frame camera using the same lens.

Canon

canon budget wildlife cameraCanon has a similar range available to you. The Canon EOS 1200D is still Canon’s main entry-level camera, costing just £205 for the body only. It has 18 megapixels and captures raw images at 3 frames per second. Don’t expect the best ISO capabilities, but it’s a real budget camera so that is a given.

Looking for something a little more? The Canon EOS 750D will set you back £450 but brings with it a 24.2 megapixel sensor and 5 frames per second shooting speed.

Stretch your budget and get the Canon 70D for a modest £675. But for that price you’ll be entertaining a 20.2 megapixel sensor and 7 frames per second shooting speed – great for freezing fast motion and capturing the perfect wildlife photo.

wildlife photography budget
This photo was taken using the Nikon D80, a much-outdated entry-level DSLR camera.

Budget Telephoto Lenses

This slice of the photography market used to be filled with only third party brands; Canon and Nikon didn’t really make anything to fill this gap. But things are changing and they’re starting to realise that it is worth monetising on budget telephoto lenses and competing with other brands like Sigma and Tamron. This is great news for us as photographers – more competition means lower prices and better quality. If you’re going to increase your budget for one element of your setup, then it should definitely be the lens. This is the most important thing – even the best cameras will take more quality images through a poor quality lens. Prioritise the glass before the camera!

Sigma

Sigma are a favourite and trusted brand when it comes to budget lenses. They now produce a variety of telephotos, but the cheapest telephoto you will get from them is the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 lens. It’s available for around £650, which is a great price for such a long focal length. The downsides are definitely evident: sharpness is lacking and the maximum aperture is poor, changing throughout the focal range. But for the price you can’t really complain! It’s available for Nikon, Canon and Sony cameras.

sigma lens wildlife

If you can stretch your budget, the recent release of the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens is definitely worth looking at (take a look at our review). There are two versions: the Contemporary and the Sport. The latter is more expensive, but comes with benefits such as weather sealing. The Contemporary version costs around £750, and the Sport version is up to £1,200.

Nikon

Nikon has recently released its own budget telephoto lens: the Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6. It’ll set you back £1,200 too, but it comes with the benefit of a constant maximum aperture throughout the focal range. Initial reports for this lens are great, and if you are going to spend that much money then this is definitely a good choice for you.

They also have the Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 lens on the market – a great choice if you want to benefit from a huge focal range.

Canon

Canon’s version of the budget telephoto has been around for a while. The latest version of the Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 lens will cost you £1,700. Not really a budget lens at all, but Canon are notorious for expensive professional telephotos (more expensive than Nikon) so this is not much of a surprise. Even so, this is a very popular lens and I know many photographers that are happy with this choice.

Other Choices

There are of course other lenses that don’t have such a long reach. Do your research and look at all four main brands: Canon, Nikon, Sigma and Tamron. Look at lenses up to 300mm – anything longer than that and the recommendations above are the best choices. But for wildlife photography you ideally want to get a longer telephoto lens, otherwise you’ll find yourself frustrated as you take more and more photos that you can’t quite zoom as much as you need to.

Should You Use Teleconverters?

Teleconverters can seem like an easy fix to the issue of price. They only cost a couple of hundred pounds and can double your lens’ reach easily enough. But they can also reduce sharpness a lot, even on professional lenses. Not only that, but the maximum aperture is greatly decreased. If you put one on a budget telephoto these reductions will be even more evident, and can actually cause the autofocus on the lens to become unusable, meaning you can only manually focus the lens. This usually happens when the maximum aperture is altered to f/8 or smaller.

If you have access to one to test out then by all means go ahead, but it definitely isn’t worth the risk in coupling one with a budget lens – you’ll probably be wasting your money. When it comes to photography equipment, cutting corners never works in the long run.

Other Equipment

Don’t forget there are other costs involved too. You need to choose a suitable memory card, although these are generally inexpensive nowadays. Next up is a tripod – using long lenses like this means this is essential. Ball heads are common choices, but if you can afford a gimbal head to support a telephoto then you’re onto a winner. The legs of your tripod are less important at this stage, and can be picked up on eBay relatively cheaply. Look for brands like Manfrotto and ensure the maximum height is suitable for you.

In Conclusion

The rest is down to you! Keep shooting and keep practising. Remember, the camera only goes part of the way to taking a great shot – don’t expect fantastic results the first time you pick up your camera.

You need to practice technique and improve upon your photos, and that’s where Nature TTL can help. Download our free eBook and subscribe to our newsletter to receive our top nature photography tutorials each week and join thousands of other photographers learning from us.

 

Will Nicholls is the founder of Nature TTL and a professional wildlife photographer and film-maker from England. Having been photographing since the age of 12, Will's images have won a string of awards, including the title of "Young British Wildlife Photographer of the Year" in 2009 from the British Wildlife Photography Awards. Will is also the author of the book On the Trail of Red Squirrels.

Download our free ebook
Grab Our FREE eBook!

Get our best tutorials sent straight to you, and enjoy a copy of "10 Ways to INSTANTLY Improve Your Nature Photos".


  • FroBro

    Nice post.
    I’d love to see a part 2 to this where you talk about how to find local wildlife, or courses to help introduce you to wildlife photography, especially for those who are nervous starting out and don’t really want to be in the local parks of London with massive lenses and people looking at you.

    And what other additional skills are good to have, bushcraft and tracking skills for example. while also setting realistic expectations as I know so many people think it’s a simple as turning up and 5 minutes later you have the shot you were hoping for. This is certainly not the case 🙂

    • Thanks for the suggestions we’ll definitely look into covering some more 🙂

    • davgar51

      There is a lot to do 🙂 but the good news? It is fun.
      Join a local natural history or birding society, and go on all their trips. Learn observing and let photos take second place.

      For a photography challenge set up a bird feeder and try to get good photos at home in your garden close by. You can learn a lot doing this. Like how hard it is to get a good photo of a Blue Tit, even when they are tame. And about light, camera settings, getting the best from auto focus, and patience of course:-)

  • Karl

    I’m currently using an old EOS 300D, I’m looking to get the 7D MK ii in the next few weeks. I currently have a Canon 90-300mm. I’m looking to get into wildlife. Would you say these will be a good match. Or should I go for something like the 70d and use extra budget for a better Telephoto lens. Thanks in advance.

    • I’d suggest that you prioritise glad before camera. So 70D and the better telephoto is a good move.

  • Richard

    Hi, I am currently using a Nikon D7200 with a Sigma 150-500, I am reasonably happy with the set-up I have but as with most people I was to constantly improve, I was looking at the Nikon 200-500 mentioned above and I noted it is an FX model, Would this work with my D7200 or is this a non-starter. Thanks in advance.

  • davgar51

    Odd you do not discuss the m43 options because they fit both a budget of both money and weight 🙂

    Super squirrel short, btw. I can see why you won prizes with those.

    • Reg Oakley

      Valid comment davgar51. Apart from focal length of lens, the most significant factor in getting quality pictures is the pixel density on the sensor ie the lower the better and M4/3 achieves this without having to heave a weighty drainpipe around. DSLRs are no longer the only option in town.

  • Jack Farley

    I have a nikon d5300 and a 55-300mm lens. I am looking at upgrading to a better telephoto lens. Could anyone suggest a good super-telephoto lens for under 1000 USD I am currently looking at the tamron 150-600mm.

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger