Megapixels: How Big Can You Really Print a Photo?

There’s something special about seeing your photos in print. Whilst they may look great on the screen, you can’t beat holding a physical copy of your work. If you take a shot you’re particularly proud of, you might find yourself tempted to print it very large and show it off. But how many megapixels do you need to print at larger sizes?

I was always told “megapixels don’t matter” when I was first starting out. I’m not quite sure why I was told this, but that definitely isn’t true. Greater resolutions mean you can print larger, have more room to crop your photo, and record finer detail in an image.

The Perfect Print Quality

When you send a photo off to be printed, you should ensure the file’s resolution is set at 300 PPI (pixels per inch). This is seen as the optimum resolution for printing; it should appear just as good on paper as on the screen. You can adjust the resolution in your photo editing software. Don’t forget to also adjust the dimensions to your ideal print size. For Lightroom users, this is in the export window. For Photoshop users, navigate to “Image > Image Size…”.

how big can a photo be printed
Adjusting the resolution of your photo in Photoshop is easy.

If your file is spat out of your camera at 4928px x 3264px then that means you have 16 megapixels: (4928 x 3264) / 1,000,000 = 16. This means you could print at 16″ x 12″ with no problem. You can see this by opening up the file and switching the dimensions to inches. If you were to print larger, then you’re beginning to stretch the file and degrade the quality, although this doesn’t become immediately noticeable (see the next section).

Contrary to belief, PPI values do not affect your viewing experience on a screen. You could have a photo at 1000 PPI and 1 PPI, and they will display exactly the same on the screen. If you’re trying to compress a photo online so people can’t print a copy of it, you need to reduce the file’s dimensions rather than the resolution.

You may have heard the term DPI (dots per inch) before, but this actually refers to the printer. The printer uses a number of these dots to create one pixel of your photograph on paper. Unless you’re printing your photos yourself at home, you don’t need to worry about DPI.

So How Large Can I Print?

With all that in mind, take a look at the following chart which will give you some idea of how large you can print your photos depending on the number of megapixels your camera has. The green spot means you’re able to achieve the optimum printing quality, and the yellow spot means the quality has started to degrade.

For example, open a 36 megapixel file and the dimensions will be near 16″ x 24″, so it gets a green spot. Open a 24 megapixel file and the dimensions will be less, so it gets a yellow spot at the 16″ x 24″ size.

All points in the chart are as if you are printing 300 DPI. So, yellow spots mean the photo is ‘stretched’ over too many pixels and has lost sharpness. However, in truth you are very unlikely to notice the difference between a ‘green spot’ and a ‘yellow spot’ unless you looked very closely or used a magnifying glass. Throughout the industry everyone prints at the ‘yellow spot level’ without issue.

how large can i blow up a photo
Green = Perfect. Yellow – Good Quality. Red = Low Quality.

Basically, anything with a green or yellow spot and you are good to go. If you are a total perfectionist producing the highest of high quality work, then you’ll want to stick to green spots only. But if this is you then you are probably still shooting with film to produce very large, high resolution images.


This is a bit of a saviour for those of us trying to print a little bigger than our file’s resolution. Tick the ‘resample’ option in Photoshop (or set the PPI value too high in Lightroom) and the software will add in the extra pixels. Of course this isn’t fool proof, and blowing pictures up extra large will begin to look strange.

If you un-tick the resample option, you’ll see that as you reduce the PPI value, the dimensions of the image become bigger. A 100px x 100px file, at 100 PPI will produce a 1″ x 1″ print. But at 10 PPI, it’ll produce a 10″ x 10″ print.

So, resampling allows you to print larger whilst retaining the PPI value of your choice.

But How Can Photographers Print Huge Billboards?

Surely you need a 1,000 megapixel camera, right? Wrong! Actually, billboards are not printed at 300 PPI. Instead, they’re more likely printed somewhere around 15 PPI. This means that up close the photo looks pixellated and fuzzy, but when have you ever pressed your face up against a billboard?

The viewing distance of a photo makes a real difference to how we perceive it. Viewing a 300 PPI photo up close will allow us to see all of the detail, sure, but with a billboard we won’t be doing this. 15 PPI is more than enough since people will be standing many metres away from it. This means that to print for a billboard, you don’t actually need a very high resolution camera.

So, if you want to print larger than your resolution allows (the red spots on the chart above), then decreasing the PPI (e.g. to 240 or less) will let you do this. But just make sure the print isn’t going to be viewed up close! If someone is viewing from a few feet away, then you’re probably safe.

Be Aware of Cropping

You may have a 36 megapixel camera, but as soon as you start cropping you are reducing the number of megapixels of the file. 1024px x 1024px equates to one megapixel, so be careful with how drastically you are cropping if you wish to start printing your work.

Will Nicholls is the founder of Nature TTL and a professional wildlife photographer and film-maker from England. Having been photographing since the age of 12, Will’s images have won a string of awards, including the title of “Young British Wildlife Photographer of the Year” in 2009 from the British Wildlife Photography Awards. Will is also the author of the book On the Trail of Red Squirrels.

Download our free ebook
Grab Our FREE eBook!

Get our best tutorials sent straight to you, and enjoy a copy of "10 Ways to INSTANTLY Improve Your Nature Photos".

  • Isabelle Saint-Pierre

    While you sort of touch on “effective viewing distance”, it is a major factor in determining just how large of a print one can make. The larger the print, the greater its effective view distance is, and hence, the lower the DPI is required for making said print. A billboard can get away with 10-15 DPI because it’s effective viewing distance is so great. The larger the print, the greater it’s effect viewing distance is. A 20″ x 30″ effect viewing distance is a 3+ feet, and hence, doesn’t need to be printed at 300 DPI, with 180 DPI being perfectly acceptable for that viewing distance. 240 DPI works wonderfully for prints larger than an A2 and 180 DPI is perfectly acceptable for really large prints.

    300 DPI is not an industry standard, but rather a guideline and a holdover from magazine print requirements, which have a very close effective viewing distance. When a site like this basically says, “your prints need to be 300 PPI/DPI” you are oversimplifying a complex issue and making people believe that 300 PPI is some magic number when it is not.

    • Yes, perhaps I should amend with a little more information about viewing distances. I think it is more obvious to me whilst writing the article, than to someone reading it freshly what I mean exactly. Thanks for your comment!

    • David Stokes

      Totally agree. I have seen an article which said you never need more than 10 mp. Why! Because 10mp will print A4 fine. If you print the same picture A3 you have to stand further back to view it, and further still for A2 and so on. So you don’t need more resolution for the larger sizes.

      At the end of the day it comes down to the quality of the lens and the sensor, and the skill of the photographer, not the megapixels.

      I have a picture on my wall printed A2. It was taken on a 12mp Nikon D90, and was heavily cropped to I would guess about 7mp. The print is pin sharp. try that on a rubbish camera.

      I am not saying megapixels are not relevant. Obviously the more you have the more you can crop a photo. But megapixels have become a con selling point for cheap compact camera manufacturers, because people automatically think that because their camera has more mp’s than their friend’s, their camera will be better. This is not necessarily true. 24mp on a full frame sensor will produce a sharper picture than 36mp on a compact, and will certainly produce a better print, especially for a photo taken in poor light.

      • Aaron Reckley

        Very well said! I came across this article while doing some research about the 24mp Sony a6500 (aps-c) vs my current A7s, 12mp Full Frame. I would love to learn a little more about your sharp 12mp A2 prints! At 300ppi I found a 16×20 to be good, but it could always be better 🙂

  • David Stokes

    I totally agree with Isabelle.

    I am also very skeptical about your megapixel table because it depends on the camera. 24mp on a top Nikon/Canon DSLR is one thing. 24mp on a £100 point and shoot as quite another. How good is the lens, and how well has the photographer focus the photo are other issues.

    • The size of 24MP is the same on any camera. The actual file size is the same, but the definition within it will vary depending on equipment, for sure.

  • Sorry, but this article is discouraging for absolutely no reason. I work for a lesding print lab, and we’d never actively discourage people from printing 60×40″ from a enthusiast-level crop 24MP camera. And guess what? Customers are never disappointed with the results.

    Resders, put faith in the limiting definitions of this article at your own risk.

    Author, way to scare people into printing smaller than their images likely deserve in this day and age when no one prints at all. I’d like to know if you’ve put your theories to the test, or if you’re just a stats obsessive? Who pixel peeps a 60×40″ print? Jeez.